While the selection sort doesn't scale well with O(n^2), it does do well at performing in tight memory constraints. It's also very easy to implement. However, most of the solutions submitted ended up doing a lot of memory/array copying.
Here is my attempt at solving the problem in functional way with minimal memory allocation / array copying. Note this does request Swift-3:
func selectionSort(_ array: inout [Int]) {
for index in 0..<array.count {
let minIndex = array
.indices
.clamped(to: index..<array.count)
.min(isOrderedBefore: { array[$0] < array[$1] })
if index != minIndex {
swap(&array[index], &array[minIndex!])
}
}
}
for index in 0..<array.count {
let minIndex = array
.indices
.clamped(to: index..<array.count)
.min(isOrderedBefore: { array[$0] < array[$1] })
if index != minIndex {
swap(&array[index], &array[minIndex!])
}
}
}
Here is a non-mutating version of the above:
func selectionSorted(_ originalArray: [Int]) -> [Int] {
var array = originalArray
for index in 0..<array.count {
let minIndex = array
.indices
.clamped(to: index..<array.count)
.min(isOrderedBefore: { array[$0] < array[$1] })
if index != minIndex {
swap(&array[index], &array[minIndex!])
}
}
return array
}
extension Array {
func selectionSorted(isOrderedBefore: (Element, Element) -> Bool) -> [Element] {
var arrayCopy = self
for index in 0..<arrayCopy.count {
let minIndex = arrayCopy
.indices
.clamped(to: index..<arrayCopy.count)
.min(isOrderedBefore: {
isOrderedBefore(arrayCopy[$0], arrayCopy[$1]) } )
if index != minIndex {
swap(&arrayCopy[index], &arrayCopy[minIndex!])
}
}
return arrayCopy
}
}
Example:
let x = [1, 3, 5, 2, 4, 9, 8, -5, 6, 4]
let minSort = x.selectionSorted(isOrderedBefore: { $0 < $1 })
That was my stab at making a functional version of SelectionSorted. Please feel to leave your comments below.
No comments:
Post a Comment